Feuerbach vs C.S. Lewis

The human race is controlled by the thirst to do what is unspoiled. visual sense provide consistently defend their actions by arguing that those actions do non really contradict a base exemplar of behavior, or they will say that they violated their standards for veracious reasons. save they always tend to say that these things that we do can be explained. When we beget making excuses for our actions then we do non pure tone good approximately what we own done. In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis discusses the design norms that hoi polloi appeal to and by which they expect others to also erect by. Lewis claims that although everyone knows about the law, everyone breaks it. He further claims that something or somebody is croup this basic law. This obvious principle of behavior is not created by humans, exclusively it is for humans to obey. Different people use divers(prenominal) labels for this law, such as traditional morality, moral law, the knowledge of rig ht and wrong, or virtue. C.S. Lewis calls it the internal Law. Feuerbach was an early prominent atheistic philosopher. He denied all supernaturalness and attributed all call down about beau topicl to talk about nature. He express that man is not strung-out on God, man is dependent on nature. Feuerbach said that the idea of God arose as a result of men desiring to have some sort of supernatural Being as an bill for their own existence and the events that they observe around them. He claims that this desire is the seed from which the God-myth grew and that his hypothesis proves that God actually did not exist. The future(a) paper will outline the contrasting arguments and viewpoints of Lewis and Feuerbach. I will use examples from C.S. Lewis Mere Christianity as well as Feuerbachs onus of Religion in order to... If you want to know a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information a! bout our service, visit our page: write my essay