In August of 1945 nuclear weapons were released upon the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Soon aft(prenominal) Japan surrended, consequently ending WWII. But was falling the washout justified, or an immoral act?
After the attack of Pearl curb in December of 1941 American military started work on the Manhattan project in secret. During the time of the development of the bomb death chair Roosevelt died, President Truman succeeded him and continued work on the nuclear bomb.
Even subsequently facing massive conventional bombings and the capturing of surrounding islands the Nipponese up to now refused to surrender. America issued Japan with the Potsdam proclamation, which demanded the unconditional surrender of Japan. This was rejected, as the Japanese were non prepared to give up their Emperor, as they believed him to be a god. Perhaps this led to the belief that the Japanese would not surrender unless dramatic action was taken. An invasion was most credibly out of the question because the cost of lives, both American and Japanese, would be too high.
At the beginning of WWII the bombing of civilians was considered a barbaric act. in time as the war progressed both sides abandoned previous restraints, although internationalistic law had always distinguished between civilians and combatants.
Prisoners of war captured by the Japanese were starved, tortured and killed. The Japanese matte that to surrender was to orient weakness and that is why they chose to fight to the death. Perhaps it is for these reasons American militants felt that if the war continued the way it was up to a jillion lives would be lost (both American and Japanese.) With this in mind displace the nuclear bomb may obtain saved numerous lives.
As the war in Europe was drawing to an end, the allies centre their efforts on defeating Japan. The USSR...
Not too bad for a high prepare essay.
It could have been improved by gathering up your chief(prenominal) points and structuring your paragraphs around them. (ie.
One paragraph on dropping an atomic bomb saved lives and one on that the dropping of the atomic bomb served as a disincentive to drop an atomic bomb ever again.)
Alot of the essay was wasted on narration. viscous to two clear paragraphs might help you to stick to compend not narrative.
The first point is a bit of a classic. At the same time it is easy to question its legitimacy. By doing this you can make your analysis more complete. I in person think that the dropping of these two bombs saved American lives at the expense of Japanese lives.
On the whole, a good brief analysis of the different factors at play in determing the rationale for dropping the A-bomb. Some of the points I question (was the A-bomb truly success deary tested during a convention in Russia? I count to remember it was on July 16 in New Mexico at a time before Potsdam in Ger many another(prenominal)). In addition, I feel it would have succeeded more with a properly focussed organised argument. Instead, many of the paragraphs were simply of one sentence with little justification or use of examples to illustrate the point.
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment