ConclusionThe claim that science and religion ask radically incompatible kinds of questions andsupply methodically different sorts of answers : Scientists , it is averred , ask how things slide by , whereas theologians ask why they occur . Scientists offer accounts that showfunctional or causal connections among phenomena , but theologians supply reasons forthe immanent world and all its processes and interconnections . Scientists qua scientists belimited to tracing character s interconnections , but unearthly thinkers seek the underlyingreason or purpose ultimately responsible for nature . It is impossible for inquiries limitedto the raison d etre of nature to conflict with investigations limited to indispensable phenomenahence religion and science cannot possibly contradict each new(prenominal) Basically , we believe Religion is based on confidence while Science is proof Since thebeginning of time , we have our protest beliefs and we based it on the Word of divinity fudge throughthe Bible .

It says , God created the world and all the living creatures on it , stated in theBook of Genesis . On the other hand , Science believed in the Evolution of Mankind . Nowthey can create humans by cloning humans . When there are calamities Religion says weare reminded by God while Science says calamities are made referable to environmentalaspectsIn reality , they are not compatible because Science has it s receive concept ofexistence . But when you think about it , Science or scientists should be closer to ReligionScientist should feel closer to God because they are the one s who are unlocking themysteries of His creations...If you want to get a all-encompassing essay, order it on our website:
OrderessayIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page:
write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment