Social

Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling caused by belongings conflicting ideas simultaneously. The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people fetch a motivational drive to reduce dissonance. They do this by changing their attitudes, beliefs, and actions.[2] Dissonance is also reduced by justifying, blaming, and denying. It is sensation of the most influential and extensively studied theories in genial psychology. A closely related term, cognitive disequilibrium, was coined by jean Piaget to refer to the experience of a discrepancy between something rising and something already known or believed.

Experience can clang with expectations, as, for warning, with buyers remorse following the purchase of an expensive item. In a state of dissonance, people may feel surprise,[2] dread, guilt, anger, or embarrassment. citizenry are biased to think of their choices as correct, despite either contrary evidence. This bias gives dissonance theory its predictive power, take away light on otherwise puzzling irrational and pestiferous behavior.





A classical example of this idea (and the origin of the cheek sour grapes) is expressed in the fable The Fox and the Grapes by Aesop (ca. 620564 BCE). In the story, a shed sees some high-hanging grapes and wishes to eat them. When the fox is unable to think of a way to reach them, he surmises that the grapes are probably not worth eating, as they must(prenominal) not be ripe or that they are sour. This example follows a soma: one desires something, finds it unattainable, and reduces ones dissonance by criticizing it. Jon Elster calls this pattern adaptive prefeIf you want to get a full essay, regulate it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .