English

he basic sources of sound evidence are the Book, that is, the Quran, and the mantic traditions, which clarify the Quran. At the time of the Prophet the laws were received straight off from him. He possessed the Quranic revelation, and he explained it directly. No transmission, speculation or analogical reasoning was necessary. After the Prophets ending direct explanation was no longer possible. The Quran was carry on through a planetary and continuous transmission. As for the mantic tradition, the men around Muhammad all agree that it was necessary to issue in accordance with whatever of it has reached us...through a sound make-up that can be trusted to be truthful...
Then general consensus took its place next to them. The men around Muhammad agreed to rule out of those who held opinions different from theirs. They would non have done that
without some terra firma for doing so, because people like the men around Muhammad do not agree upon something without a valid reason. In addition, the evidence attests the infallibility of the all group. Thus, general consensus became a valid proof in legal matters.




Then we looked into the methods according to which the men around Muhammad and the early generations do their deductions from the Quran and the Prophetic traditions. It was found that they compared similar cases and drew conclusions from the analogy...Many of the things that happened afterwards the Prophet are not included in the naturalized texts. Therefore they compared and combined them with the established indications that are found in the texts, according to certain rules that governed their combinations. This assured the soundness of their comparison of both similar cases, so that it could be assumed that one and the uniform divine law covered both cases. This became another figure of legal evidence, because the early Muslims all agreed upon it.If you want to define a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .